comment
| -
A similarity relationships between two objects (so far, either an agent, a signal or a genre, but
this could grow).
This relationship is pretty general and doesn't make any assumptions on how the similarity claim
was derived.
Such similarity statements can come from a range of different sources (Musicbrainz similarities between
artists, or coming from some automatic content analysis).
However, the origin of such statements should be kept using a named graph approach - and ultimately, the
documents providing such statements should attach some metadata to themselves (confidence of the claim, etc.).
-
A similarity relationships between two objects (so far, either an agent, a signal or a genre, but
this could grow).
This relationship is pretty general and doesn't make any assumptions on how the similarity claim
was derived.
Such similarity statements can come from a range of different sources (Musicbrainz similarities between
artists, or coming from some automatic content analysis).
However, the origin of such statements should be kept using a named graph approach - and ultimately, the
documents providing such statements should attach some metadata to themselves (confidence of the claim, etc.).
-
A similarity relationships between two objects (so far, either an agent, a signal or a genre, but
this could grow).
This relationship is pretty general and doesn't make any assumptions on how the similarity claim
was derived.
Such similarity statements can come from a range of different sources (Musicbrainz similarities between
artists, or coming from some automatic content analysis).
However, the origin of such statements should be kept using a named graph approach - and ultimately, the
documents providing such statements should attach some metadata to themselves (confidence of the claim, etc.).
|